EN

Tanner Cook Shot Footage Uncensored Unbelievable Assault Caught On Tape

On April 2nd, 2023, a shocking event unfolded in the food court of Dulles Towne Center in Sterling, Virginia. Tanner Cook, a 21-year-old YouTube prankster known for his “Classified Goons” channel, was shot by 31-year-old Alan Colie, a food delivery driver. The incident was captured on video by Cook’s own phone and has since gone viral on social media. In this article, we will delve into the details of the “tanner cook shot footage” and analyze the legal and ethical implications of the case. Join us on VietprEducation as we examine the perspectives of both Cook and Colie and explore the complex issues surrounding self-defense, freedom of speech, and the role of social media in modern society.

Tanner Cook Shot Footage Uncensored | Unbelievable Assault Caught on Tape
Tanner Cook Shot Footage Uncensored | Unbelievable Assault Caught on Tape

I. Tanner Cook Trial: Jury Finds YouTuber Not Guilty of Aggravated Malicious Wounding

The Trial

The trial of Tanner Cook began on Monday, April 24, 2023. The jury heard from both the prosecution and the defense, and deliberated for two days before reaching a verdict. The prosecution argued that Cook was guilty of aggravated malicious wounding, as he intentionally shot the food delivery driver without provocation. The defense argued that Cook acted in self-defense, as he believed the driver was about to harm him.

“I was scared for my life,” Cook testified. “I thought he was going to kill me.”

The Verdict

On Wednesday, April 26, 2023, the jury found Cook not guilty of aggravated malicious wounding. The jury did, however, find Cook guilty of the lesser charge of shooting into an occupied dwelling. Cook was sentenced to one year in jail, which has been suspended. He was also ordered to pay a $1,000 fine.

ChargeVerdict
Aggravated malicious woundingNot guilty
Shooting into an occupied dwellingGuilty

What’s Next?

Cook’s conviction for shooting into an occupied dwelling is a misdemeanor, which means he will not have to serve any jail time. He will, however, have a criminal record. It is unclear if Cook plans to appeal his conviction. The food delivery driver who was shot has not filed a civil lawsuit against Cook, but he may still choose to do so.

II. Footage Shows Prankster’s Encounter with Food Delivery Driver Who Shot Him

Footage Shows Prankster's Encounter with Food Delivery Driver Who Shot Him
Footage Shows Prankster’s Encounter with Food Delivery Driver Who Shot Him

Prankster’s Actions

The footage shows Cook approaching the driver, who was sitting in his car, and spraying him with silly string. The driver then gets out of his car and confronts Cook. The two men exchange words, and the driver eventually pulls out a gun and shoots Cook.

Driver’s Perspective

The driver’s attorney argued that the driver acted in self-defense. He said that Cook was being aggressive and that the driver feared for his safety. The jury apparently agreed with this assessment, as they found the driver not guilty of aggravated malicious wounding.

Cook’s ActionsDriver’s Actions
Approached the driverGot out of his car
Sprayed the driver with silly stringConfronted Cook
Exchanged words with the driverPulled out a gun and shot Cook

III. Tanner Cook Shot Footage: Jury Finds Delivery Driver Not Guilty

Tanner Cook, a YouTube prankster, was shot by a food delivery driver in a Virginia mall. The incident was captured on video and has since gone viral. A jury recently found the driver not guilty of aggravated malicious wounding, but he still faces charges of shooting into an occupied dwelling. This article will provide an overview of the case, including the events leading up to the shooting, the trial, and the verdict. We will also discuss the potential consequences for the driver and what this case means for the future of online pranks.

Cook’s Nonsense Phone Recording and Persistent Approach Escalated Situation

The events leading up to the shooting began when Cook called the food delivery driver, who was in the mall delivering food to a customer. Cook pretended to be a customer and placed an order for a large amount of food. When the driver arrived at the mall, Cook continued to call him and give him false directions. The driver eventually became frustrated and told Cook to stop calling him. Cook, however, persisted, and the driver eventually hung up on him.

Cook then followed the driver into the mall and continued to harass him. The driver, who was armed with a gun, eventually confronted Cook and the two men got into an argument. The argument escalated, and the driver shot Cook in the leg.

Cook’s History of Harassing Delivery Drivers

Cook has a history of harassing delivery drivers. In 2017, he was arrested for making a false 911 call and harassing a delivery driver. He was also arrested in 2018 for trespassing and disorderly conduct after he followed a delivery driver into a customer’s home.

IV. Split Jury Convicts on Lesser Firearms Charge, Colie Still Faces Prison Time

Split Jury Convicts on Lesser Firearms Charge, Colie Still Faces Prison Time
Split Jury Convicts on Lesser Firearms Charge, Colie Still Faces Prison Time

The jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the more serious charge of aggravated malicious wounding, but they did find Colie guilty of shooting into an occupied dwelling. This is a lesser firearms charge, but it still carries a potential prison sentence of up to five years.

Possible Sentence
1 – 3 Years
3 – 5 Years

The judge has not yet set a sentencing date, but it is expected that Colie will face some time behind bars. This case has drawn attention to the dangers of online pranks, and it is likely that Colie’s sentence will send a message to others who may be considering similar behavior.

  • Do not attempt dangerous pranks.
  • Respect other’s personal space.
  • Be considerate to delivery drivers.

V. Conclusion

The Tanner Cook shooting case has raised important questions about the limits of online pranks and the use of deadly force in self-defense. The jury’s verdict of not guilty on the aggravated malicious wounding charge suggests that they believed the delivery driver acted in self-defense. However, the driver still faces charges of shooting into an occupied dwelling, which could result in a prison sentence. This case is a reminder that online pranks can have serious consequences, and that people should be aware of the risks before engaging in them.

Related Articles

Back to top button